Showing posts with label city beat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label city beat. Show all posts

Friday, September 25, 2009

Toronto Mayor Miller not running for a third term

Toronto Mayor David Miller announced this morning that he will not run next year. He says he wants to spend more time with his family. Good reason!

This is going to open up the mayoralty race next year. The political landscape has just changed radically with the incumbent out of the picture. I'm betting we'll see George Smitherman and John Tory in the race, and I wouldn't be surprised to see someone from Miller's inner circle step up to represent the left.

I'd like to see some change at City Hall. There are a number of councillors who I think have over-stayed their welcome as well.

I'm most interested in watching how events unfold in the coming months as the various politicians position themselves for a 2010 election.

Friday, September 11, 2009

Bye Bye Pages

I'm sad to see the closing of Pages Books here in Toronto. Pages was an excellent independent bookstore that could always be counted on to feature alternatives to big box books fare. It was a place where you could find loads of books published by small presses, plenty of poetry, literary and art criticism, periodicals and more. Almost anytime I found myself in that stretch of Queen West, I liked to pop in and look over the featured books tables. I often found a surprise, a chuckle or a book I just had to read.

It must be tremendously challenging to run an independent bookstore in the face of online competition. It's a hard reality because we're losing places with character, places that have made our city richer. I read the other day that some possibility exists that Pages may re-emerge elsewhere at some point in the future, and I really hope it happens.

Wednesday, September 09, 2009

Miller support sinking

A new Ipsos Reid poll finds Toronto Mayor Miller's approval rating at only 29%. At the same time, provincial Minister of almost everything George Smitherman stopped flat-out denying he was interested in the job. I hope that if Smitherman runs, John Tory chooses to back away and continue to pursue his talk radio career. This won't all shake down until sometime in the new year, but the players are starting to jockey for position already.

The Mayor dismissed the polls, but these results must be alarming to him and his team. It will be most interesting to see the moves he makes in the coming months.

Monday, September 07, 2009

Running clean trains...

I confess I hadn't thought about this issue until I received the link from a friend up in The Junction.

Obviously electric trains would be a benefit to all the neighbourhoods the current diesel trains rumble through. Of course, somewhere along the line, the electricity has to be generated and that is another can of worms, isn't it?

What do you think?

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Tunnel to Island Airport?

I was surprised to read about a proposal for a tunnel from the mainland to the Island Airport here in Toronto, to replace the 90 second ferry ride. It wasn't all that long ago that Mayor Miller campaigned successfully on stopping a proposed fixed link to the Airport. Since the fixed link was squashed, Porter Airlines began what appears to be a successful commuter business running flights out of the Island. It's popular with business commuters who can get on plane headed for places like Ottawa without having to go to the suburbs to do so.

I presume the airport is going to continue operating for some time to come, but I think they should simply keep the ferry service in place. It's a historical oddity that if anything adds character to the fabric of the city. There are legitimate complaints about having a downtown airport, and not just from Toronto Island residents. Let's not open the doors to expansion.

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Hazel to run again

Long time popular Mississauga, Ontario Mayor Hazel McCallion has announced that she intends to run for another term. Why not? She's only 88 and 11 terms aren't quite enough to accomplish everything.... Last time out she garnered 92% of the votes. It will be interesting to see if anybody takes a run at her this time out.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Globe reports: Toronto Civic Workers keep banking sick time

An article in the Globe and Mail states that the City of Toronto's deal with civic workers allows existing workers to continue banking and cashing out sick days: The tentative deal reached earlier this week would allow people already working for the city to bank 18 sick days a year and cash them out as the equivalent of six months pay at retirement. Earlier reports had said that the deal allowed workers to either get a payout now or later, with the program of accumulating days ending.

If this report is true, why was there a strike?

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Deal reached in civic workers strike

It has to be ratified by the members and voted on by Council, but a deal has been struck featuring a compromise on the issue of employee sick time.

It has been reported that the deal ends the previous system of accumulated sick time, and apparently offers instead the choice of an immediate payout, or the ability to hold onto currently banked time until retirement. A short-term disability scheme will replace the current sick day system.

Yesterday, Mark Ferguson, president of CUPE Local 416, made a statement saying Union negotiators fought back all the concessions the City demanded. This was a very puzzling statement given the details that have begun to emerge this morning. Reports this morning say that with this deal there will be no more accumulation of days. In other words, the City has ended the practice of accumulating sick days, but has ended it at a substantial cost.

I haven't seen all the details, but looking at the reports in the morning papers, I would call this a generous compromise. I think CUPE has negotiated as much benefit as they were likely to get out of giving up the old sick day system. The City made the substantial structural change they were looking for, but the cost was high. It's too bad it took a 36 day strike to reach a compromise, but I think this is better than a legislated settlement by far. The mess will be cleaned up quickly and residents will get over it quickly.

Friday, July 24, 2009

News on the Civic Workers strike

Earlier today, Union reps were quoted saying they hoped their new counter-offer would lead to a settlement. By this afternoon the rhetoric had shifted, and Union leaders were threatening to leave the table if there was no progress over the weekend. Inside workers were saying something different again. They were saying they would stay at the table, even if the outside workers left.

Mayor Miller responded: “I have stated repeatedly over the past several weeks that the unions needed to bring a sense of urgency to the bargaining table and get on with reaching an agreement.”

If there is going to be a non-legislated settlement, I think it will happen in the next few days.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

It's been just over a month....

...since civic workers in Toronto began strike action. I've seen many different reactions in the city, the loudest coming from people who live near temporary dump sites. Although the strike covers many different jobs, it centres around waste pick-up. In my area, which happens to be the only area in the city now with contracted out waste pick-up, the only thing not being picked up is garden waste. I haven't heard a single person in my area complain about any of the other services not being available.

We see picketers every day at the water filtration plant down the street. These are the most laid-back picketers I've ever seen. They set up lawn chairs and lounge around mostly. I saw some lap-tops out there the other day. I'm sure there are some management people crossing the line to keep the plant going but we don't see that.

I ask people all the time what they think. What's fair? How should the strike be settled. Nobody seems anxious for back-to-work legislation. The weather has been cool and that has kept the smell down at the dumpsites. Mostly, I find people are not talking about it. Residents are dealing with their garbage in different ways, and coping with the lack of other services as best they can. We take a core fitness class in a city building and the class has simply moved outside. In some areas, people have "taken back their parks" and gone out with lawn mowers to clean up the soccer fields. Overall, I would say the city is remarkably clean given the circumstances.

One fellow I talk to has suggested a compromise based on a grandfathering scheme. Some people find the city's last offer, which includes sick-time payouts up to something like $8,000, quite attractive. A number of people I've spoken with seem generally sympathetic with workers being asked to give up something they've previously bargained for, but at the same time are not so sympathetic on the specific issue.

Mayor Miller is starting to give refunds to people who have paid and registered for various programs. As of this morning, I've heard no talk of refunds on waste collection. I wonder how the whole business effects the city balance sheet?

So far, residents are coping. There is no sign of a settlement on the horizon.

Friday, July 17, 2009

Almost everyone I know in Toronto has had at least one bike stolen

Check out this story in Spacing Toronto about a woman who got her bike back!

Monday, July 13, 2009

Hey Ho Hey Ho - Miller's curious problem

Apparently, City union protestors were recently heard chanting Hey ho hey ho Mayor Miller's got to go.

Interesting business. After all, Toronto Mayor Miller is well known as the labour Mayor, as a union supporter and as the so-called NDP mayor. Miller is about as left of centre a mayor as CUPE is going to get, no?

Now that Mr. Miller, who has been a spender, is trying to cut back, first freezing management salaries and now fighting for a less expensive sick leave plan for City workers, he has a problem, finding himself at loggerheads with his support base. The folks at CUPE should be careful what they ask for, though. A different Mayor may not help their already unpopular cause.

A recent Ipsos-Reid poll suggests Miller's support has dropped off and that he would lose to either John Tory or George Smitherman if either potential candidate ran against him. Interesting. Tory wants to be a politician but he's had trouble winning, both in provincial and municipal politics. I think Smitherman would be an excellent candidate, but he has dismissed speculation that he will run next municipal election.

Beyond obviously wanting a settlement in the civic worker dispute, I'm very interested in watching the municipal politics unfold. Can Miller salvage his support with a strike settlement? Will residents forget the strike by the time the election comes along? Who will run against Miller next election? He came into office with broom in hand, apparently to sweep away the old stale politics of the past, but beyond pushing forward his transit agenda, it seems as if he hasn't done all that much.

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

Skid Row to Hip in Toronto?

East Texas Red sent me an interesting article from the New York Times about the area of Toronto known as The Junction, called Skid Row to Hip in Toronto. It's interesting in that it is an outsider's simple view of a neighbourhood in transition. It's unfortunately poorly researched and tells little of the rich story of this area.

My grandfather owned and operated the Queen's City Leatherworks in the Junction, a storefront factory/retail/residence from the 1920s until the 1960s. They made gloves for the railwaymen, as the Junction was more than a jumble of tracks, it was a rail town, a workingman's town. My father grew up in what we called affectionately "the Glove Shop". They were a working class family living upstairs and behind the retail store, and above the basement workshop. They were all musicians on the side. My grandpa played violin, and made them too. My uncle Eugene carried on that tradition. My father played sax and clarinet. Uncle Billy played Cello and Uncle Harold was a piano prodigy who would later mingle with the artistic elite in Paris.

Later, by the time the railway business became ancient Canadian history, and the Junction became "Little Malta", my father opened Alumacraft, a small factory making aluminum windows and doors, located just across the street from the Queen's City Leatherworks. Through these decades, the Junction was the only area of the city that was dry. No pubs. No liquor stores. No restaurants serving wine or beer or booze.

I remember the window shop was heated by wood in the winter. My father got hardwood offcuts from a furniture company to heat the place. I liked to take the wood pieces out to the vacant lot next door and create imaginary wooden worlds. Later, I would hang with the Junction kids, the ones that played in the lane out back. We would find old spray paint cans that were still pressurized and take turns whipping rocks and pieces of cement at them. The kid who punctured the can and made it dance won.

A kid named Jerry let all the cows out of their pens at Canada Packers. The packers was located along St. Clair. Oh did it stink along there, one of the strongest smells from my youth. I have a vague memory, or maybe it's a dream and not a memory, of guys driving pickup trucks down Dundas and along Runnymede, herding the cattle. There was a reata-man, a modern-day vacarro, a buccarroo standing in the back of each truck, lasso in hand, trying to rope the stray cows. Could that be true? I don't think I could make that up.

When I was growing up, there was a stretch just west of Keele St. that was a shopping district in decline. I remember it was a place where brides to be shopped for their dresses. Some of the storefronts had marvelous window displays on each side of the entrance. By the time I rented a studio in the early 80s in an old convenience store warehouse in the Junction, the area had lost it's shine. Reading the article, you would think the area became something out of "The Wire", with corner boys and hookers everywhere. True it was a little rough around the edges, but it was not nearly as bad as the article made it sound.

The seeds of the positive change came with the change in the law making it legal to sell alcohol in the Junction. By this time, a number of artists had set up in the area, taking advantage of some temporarily cheap rents. Yes, the area started to gentrify. However, the following quote from the article made me laugh out loud:
Block by block, they are transforming this stretch of Dundas Street West from a grimy skid row into a bright enclave filled with quirky bookstores, vegan restaurants and organic cafes. The other adorable line from the article is "Non-vegans have options too."

The Junction is a fascinating area full of stories. One day I'll tell you some more of them. It never was quite what the Times says it was and I'm not so sure it will ever be what they say it is now. How interesting though, that the New York Times travel twigged to this curious neighbourhood.

Sunday, July 05, 2009

Residents block pesticide trucks

The civic workers strike continues here in Toronto. There are still no winners, only losers. The group Friends of Christie Pits has stepped up its war against the temporary garbage dump in its community, vowing to ignore urgings from Toronto's top public health official that it stop preventing the site from being sprayed for insects.

The neighbourhood has been standing firm, not letting the pesticide trucks in. However, now there is an injunction in place to stop the protesters. Did I mention that everybody loses during this strike?

There is an interesting side issue to this. Here in Toronto, pesticides are banned for use on lawns because of environmental concerns, but the City is telling residents that the nasty chemicals they spray on the temporary dump sites are safe and there are no health risks. Some people who want to spray similar nasty chemicals on their lawns are saying, see, our chemicals must be safe. Yesterday, a friend of ours, noticing the thriving weeds on our back lawn, suggested a trip to Buffalo to get enough pesticide to treat the lawn. I'm not sure if he was serious. I support the pesticide ban. The solution to pests on the temporary dump sites is to end the strike today and clean them up.

Friday, June 26, 2009

No winners

The civic worker strike in Toronto continues. A number of city parks are on the road to becoming stinking little garbage dumps. The media reported that the Mayor was seen slipping into City Hall by a side door the other day to avoid facing picketers.

Nobody wins.

What's the very best the union is likely to get out of the strike? My guess is an arbitrated settlement that doesn't do too much damage to their sick benefits is about the best they can hope for.

The politicians lose too. They lose credibility. They lose votes. Miller has been seen as a "labour" Mayor but his popularity has been tanking. How much can the city afford to give up? The feds just nixed their request for money to cover the much talked about deal for new LRT vehicles. Hardly anyone is saying lets pay more taxes.

Residents lose all around. Garbage piles up. Day cares are closed. Permits are all on hold.

Nobody wins. Everybody loses. The garbage piles up.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Toronto City workers on strike

Toronto City employees are on strike this week with no sign of an agreement in the near future. At the heart of the issue is sick benefits. City employees have one of the sweetest deals anywhere. Employees earn 18 sick days each year, can bank what they don't use, and get paid out upon retirement. The City would like to change that to a more affordable program. There are a number of models out there that work out pretty well for everyone concerned. The CUPE, like most unions doesn't ever want to give up what it successfully negotiated in the past. This isn't going to be a popular strike given so many recession related job-losses. Many people would be happy to grab a City job even with a quarter of the sick days.

When we say City employees, we're talking about waste collection, daycare, community centres, parking, by-law enforcement, permits and more. Highlighting the strike though, will be waste collection. The strike is only two days old and already people are dumping garbage in parks. I should note that in the former Etobicoke where we live, waste collection is contracted out, so we're not going to face the smelly mess the rest of the city is going to have to cope with.

I'm OK with some City employees being able to strike. I respect the collective bargaining process. However, I draw the line at garbage because it is a health issue. I expect the City government and the provincial government to take steps to protect us from unhealthy piles of stinking garbage. This is a test for Mayor Miller and for Premier McGuinty. An angry Mayor Miller won't tolerate dumping. Well look, deal with the problem. In my opinion, waste collection employees should have a fair arbitrated relatively generous settlement, comparable to similar work elsewhere, on the road to becoming an essential service.

Monday, June 22, 2009

It's Pride week in Toronto



Happy Pride Week!

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Oddball fifth lane of Jarvis St. to be ancient Canadian history

Jarvis St. in Toronto is unique in that it supports five lanes of traffic with a centre lane that is for southbound traffic in the morning and northbound traffic in the evening. The direction of flow for the curious centre lane is controlled by lights above the lane. For drivers, this is less confusing than it sounds. I think it is the only street with this feature in Toronto.

Toronto council passes plan to narrow Jarvis in favour of bike lanes

This plan has been all over the news. Cyclists are cheering a step which they see will provide safety for cyclists on a major thoroughfare. Critics of Mayor Miller are calling it another step in what they see as his war against the car.

I confess I rarely drive Jarvis St., especially around rush hour, so I can't speak to traffic issues there with any authority. I've seen reduction of automobile lanes in favour of bike lanes work on smaller arteries in the city. An example is Rogers Rd, which got bike lanes back when I was living in that area. The difference of course is that Rogers is not a road that carries commuters into the downtown core the way Jarvis is.

Critics have framed the issue by comparing numbers like 27,000 cars vs 50 bicycles. Miller has countered by saying that transportation is about moving people, not about moving cars. Clearly, there will not be 27,000 more cyclists after the change has been made. It is less clear what will happen to traffic patterns as people who continue to drive into the core look for other alternatives. What is the public transit option for these commuters?

In the past, I've argued that it is worthwhile to preserve some of our character neighbourhoods and some of the historical backbone of the city. Some may apply that arguement to the unique centre lane of Jarvis. While I'm not convinced that the change just approved by Council is the way to go, in this case, I wouldn't apply either a historical or neighbourhood arguement.

It should be noted that the change will cost $6 million and none of that is accounted for in the current budget.

“Frankly I am amazed that anyone, looking at Toronto ... can possibly say that taking one lane of traffic to create two lanes of safe cycling for cyclists, on a street that intersects with three east-west bike paths, could possibly be the wrong thing to do,” Mr. Miller said, pointing to similar moves in New York and other cities..

A traffic study suggests that the change would add two minutes to the commute for the drivers that use the route. I imagine it is immpossible to predict if the change will actually discourage anyone from driving. Why not model the change? Instead of pushing it through and hoping everything will work out alright, let's try it for six months, study what happens, then hold a meaningful debate in Council.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Torontonians: have any of you eaten from one of the new ethnic food carts yet?

The City decided some time ago that Toronto was ready to embrace street food that goes beyond the sausage. Who knew it was actually a rule? This venture is highly regulated. In fact, I understand that many vendors have been scared away by the rulebook and the fees. None-the-less, two new carts have opened for business at Nathan Phillips Square, serving Greek and Indian foods, and more carts are slated to appear in other locations in coming weeks.

Bland
Healthier than Burgers
Carts court street food crowd
Hotdog sellers steamed
a la cart

Next time I'm near one of the new carts, I'll definitely stop by for a snack.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Lakeshore LRT Public Meeting

Last night's public meeting was very well attended. It's good to see that plenty of people in the area are participating in this process. Kudos to Councillor Mark Grimes for pushing the process back to square one to make sure the community has full opportunity to engage with the project team and make our views known.

There was a presentation, and then the public were invited to go up to a mic and ask questions. There were a lot of concerns raised for the neighbourhoods of Mimico, New Toronto and Longbranch, and there were also a few voices firmly behind the concept an LRT from Humber Loop to Longbranch.

Here are some of the points I took away from the meeting:

The City is firmly committed to rail and firmly committed to right-of-ways. Although this was termed a planning exercise and there is no funding committed for the 2016 LRT plan at this stage, the speakers were not interested in entertaining other possibilities, such as electric trolley-buses.

Some people at the meeting clearly believe that those who oppose a transit right-of-way are simply afraid of change.

To the TTC and the City, transit improvement clearly means fulfilling the Transit City plan for LRTs.

The main tangible benefit our communities could expect from the LRT is a 5 minute time savings travelling from Longbranch to Humber. It was suggested that LRTs = city building and that they would bring positive development to the community, intensification and new businesses. The TTC rep said an LRT would be socially good for the city. However, I do not believe the TTC, planners or anyone really have a clear bead on how a divided rail corridor would change our community.

As one resident suggested, Lakeshore Blvd is not a transportation corridor, it's our main street.

Another long term resident and TTC user pointed out that the period during which the service in our communities was best was during the TTC track rehabilitation when buses were run on Lakeshore. Another resident suggested double-decker trolley buses. Interesting idea. However, buses are not being entertained as a transit improvement solution for our area, with the exception of express buses running to Union Station, which our councillor has been advocating.

One resident pointed out that street cars have no difficulty in the Mimico-New Toronto-Longbranch stretch - they get mired in traffic once the line hits Queen St. It was noted in the presentation that the Longbranch line and the Queen line were amalgamated in 1995. In other words, there used to be dedicated Longbranch cars that ran from Longbranch to Humber Loop. If you wanted to go downtown, you would transfer to a downtown car. Now, street cars run all the way across the city, so if there is a problem due to traffic on Queen West, it affects service west of Humber Loop as well. I wonder if adding back one or two dedicated Longbranch street cars would increase frequency enough to equal the 5 minutes savings which a LRT right-of-way might offer? I would like to see this studied and costed out.

I think that at the core of the discussion is the idea the city has that a network of light rail is the right thing for the city, regardless of what it might do to individual neighbourhoods. It seems that to the City, rail development is the way to improving transit and improving the city. I would be far more comfortable with a plan that suggested looking for solutions that enhanced each neighbourhood instead. There may be areas in which LRT is an excellent solution, and at the same time, areas in which unique solutions such as the double-decker trolley buses suggested last night are the way to go. It is a mistake for the City to impose a homogeneous light rail vision.

In exchange for a 5 minute time savings on the Longbranch to Humber Loop run, we are being asked to endure major construction as well as a big wildcard in terms of what the changes will do to the character of our neighbourhoods. I don't think the LRT proposal is as much about improving transit as it is about imposing a light rail vision consistent with the Transit City plan. I'm also concerned that the planning for Lakeshore LRT is not being coordinated with Go Transit. Consider that Go, our other commuter rail network, already has traffic-free dedicated tracks. Go trains are currently a very fast way to get from Longbranch to downtown. The drawback is frequency of service, which is not great. The question has to be asked, instead of creating a right-of-way for light rail on Lakeshore Blvd, why not concentrate on improving Go Transit for getting downtown, and look at alternative solutions for Lakeshore that might not turn our main street into a transportation corridor.